November 23

English 2023

ePortfolio Reflection

23/11/2023

1.0 Overview Of The Year

Overall, I have done well in English this year. As the year progressed, my grades improved as did my confidence in my knowledge of the topics we were studying. During English this year, I have had the opportunity to develop effective communication, problem-solving, ethics, collaboration and leadership on the capabilities wheel through group projects, for example, Task Four: Oral Presentation on Teenagers. I also feel that I have been able to develop creativity on the capabilities wheel through creative writing, for example, Task Seven: Composition of a Genre-Specific Narrative. Finally, I have been able to develop organisation on the capabilities wheel by completing take-home assignments and preparing for in-class assessments.

2.0 Specific Achievement One

2.1 Briefly Outline The Achievement

An assessment that I did particularly well in would be Task Seven: Composition of a Genre-Specific Narrative. The task for this assessment was to compose an original short story that adheres to one of the five genres we were provided. We were to select either a visual or written prompt (provided) from one genre, which was the basis of our narrative.

2.2 Describe The Process That You Took That Led To That Achievement

For this assessment, I chose the genre that I would be writing and chose whether I was going to use the visual or written prompt for that particular genre. I chose to write a dystopian short story with the written prompt of ‘in a future world, emotions are controlled by a mysterious organisation. One day, someone finds an object that sparks unfamiliar feelings.’ We then planned our short stories including main and minor characters, settings, the main conflict and how it was resolved. I then created a plot diagram, giving details of the exposition, rising action, climax, falling action and resolution. I created a draft of my short story. Afterwards, I edited, rewrote and changed lines of my story, creating my final draft.

2.3 How Long Did It Take?

This assessment was an assignment, meaning that it was a take-home task, compared to an in-class task. We were given two weeks in Term Three and one week in Term Four for this assessment. This means that we were given three weeks of class time for the assessment and a total of five weeks, including the school holidays. I appreciated this time for the assessment as I had a lot of time to create a thorough plan, a draft and an edited final copy.

2.4 How did you feel about your achievement?

Overall, I was really happy and proud of my achievement. I thought that all of my efforts had paid off.

3.0 Specific Achievement Two

3.1 Briefly Outline The Achievement

Another assessment that I did particularly well in would be Task Eight – Essay on Feature Film. The task for this assessment was to answer a question relating to the feature film we studied in the form of a two or three page essay. We were given a choice of the three questions, ‘explore how the director manipulates filmic conventions for a specific audience response throughout the film, discuss how a character’s construction or development reinforces key theme/s throughout a studied film, or, how do setting or symbols support a key idea/theme of a studied film?’

3.2 Describe The Process That You Took That Led To That Achievement

For this assessment, I chose to answer the question, discuss how a character’s construction or development reinforces key theme/s throughout a studied film.’ I wrote an introduction using the structure of a restatement of the question, a global statement, a nutshell sentence and a thesis statement. I then wrote three body paragraphs using the structure of a topic sentence, an example, an explanation and a linking sentence. Finally, I wrote a conclusion using the structure of a restatement of the question, a summary of my discussion and analysis and my thoughts on the feature film.

3.3 How Long Did It Take?

This assessment was an essay, meaning that it was an in-class task, compared to a take-home task. We were given 50 minutes to plan and write our essay to answer the question.

3.4 How did you feel about your achievement?

Overall, I was really happy and proud of my achievement. I thought that all of my efforts had paid off.

4.0 Where To Now?

Next year, I am going to work on evaluating research so that in future assessments on this topic, my essay response to these questions will be more analysed. I will also state specific examples, as these are the two pointers, I was given to improve upon for Task Two: Evaluate Podcast Research. I am also going to work on the analysis of a studied topic so that in future assessments on this topic, my essay response to these questions will be more precise. I will make my responses more precise by identifying conventions and referring to the question, as these are two pointers, I was given to improve upon for Task Five: Close Analysis. Next year, I also hope to continue to develop my capabilities from the capabilities wheel, for example, effective communication, problem-solving, ethics, collaboration and leadership through group projects, creativity through creative writing and organisation by completing take-home assignments and preparing for in-class assessments. I will also develop my inquisitiveness on the capabilities wheel through further analysing studied topics.

Figure One: Capabilities Wheel

November 14

Science Assessment 8

Project and ePortfolio Submission

14/11/2023

1.0 Representation of the project

1.1 What was the task you were given?

We were given the task of designing a building that would withstand a major earthquake. We needed to design, build and test a small-scale model.

1.2 What was the problem you tried to solve?

The problem is casualties of earthquakes increasing due to the lack of earthquake-resistant buildings. An example would be the Nepal earthquake in 2015 when there were no earthquake-resistant buildings. Because Nepal is an earthquake-prone country and there is constant destruction, the risk of people getting injured or killed in an earthquake is increased, meaning earthquake-resistant buildings need to be designed and built.

2.0 Overview of the engineering process

2.1 What changes would you make to the process that would improve the outcomes for your group in the future?

2.1.1 Change to the design step of the process

A change I would make in the design step of the process would be measuring the length of the spaghetti before drawing our diagram of the building. I would make this change as I thought the spaghetti would be 30 cm long, meaning we would only need two levels in the construction to meet the required 60 cm. To reach the required 60 cm, we would need to use more spaghetti, meaning we would have to use less blu-tack to fit the budget. Our original diagram was a cube-shaped structure and we had to change our design to be a triangular-shaped structure to fit the budget, reach the required 60 cm and be able to withstand the earthquake-stimulator test.

2.1.2 Change to the creation step of the process

A change I would make in the creation step of the process would be making sure that all the pieces of spaghetti used were the same length. I would make this change as the spaghetti on one side of the building is shorter than the other side. This has made our building lopsided. This would improve the outcomes for my group in the future as the building would be less shaky when undergoing the earthquake-stimulator test.

3.0 Collaboration

3.1 Provide a brief summary of the investigation components that each of your group members was responsible for.

My group members were Stacie and Muskan. The three of us worked well together as we equally split up the work. I was responsible for doing the research, creating the diagrams for our design and some of the construction. Muskan was responsible for most of the construction. Stacie was responsible for some of the construction and making sure we had the materials necessary without going out of our budget.

Project Manager: Scarlett

Organisation to make sure that everyone understands the projects and is on track.

Equipment Manager: Stacie

Can efficiently clean up our station after each session and make sure the equipment needed is accessible.

Speaker: Muskan

Able to understand and analyse the task and is able to ask for assistance from the teacher or other students or research any information.

Reporter: Muskan

Organisation to make sure the task is completed and of high standard before the submission date.

3.2 Comment on how the strengths of each group member contributed to the engineering challenge.

I was responsible for doing the research because I am good at researching and summarising information. I was also responsible for creating the diagrams because I like drawing. I was not responsible for a lot of the construction because I am not good at tedious work. Muskan was responsible for most of the construction because she is good at tedious work and she enjoys creating things. Stacie was responsible for some of the construction because she likes creating things. She was also responsible for making sure we had the materials necessary without going out of budget because she is organised and she is good at calculations.

Figure one: diagram one of our earthquake-resistant building

Figure two: diagram two of our earthquake-resistant building (prototype one) (Left)

Figure three: diagram three of our earthquake-resistant building (prototype two) (right)

Figure four: prototype of our earthquake-resistant building

Figure five: video of our earthquake-resistant building being tested