Georgia Dartnall

Student Portfolio

Costume Design- Encanto

I have chosen to design a costume of the character of Mirabel as she is the one, I will be paying in the actual show. Mirabel is a young girl imperfect and weird and quirky, but also deeply emotional and incredibly empathetic. Mirabel is a young girl who may be imperfect and “weird,” but is also empathetic and emotional. She’s determined to prove that she belongs, denying to everyone, including herself, that she feels all alone even in her own house.

Background info:

Born into the Madrigal family, Mirabel is the youngest daughter of Julieta and Augstin, and the younger sister of Isabela and Luisa. In addition to being the niece of Felix, Pepa and Bruno, Mirabel is also the cousin of Dolores, Camilo, and Antonio. On the night of five-year-old Mirabel’s gift ceremony, she touched the door handle of her soon-to-be room, excited about what kind of gift she would get. But her door suddenly faded away, and she didn’t get a gift like the rest of her family. This left everyone who attended the ceremony shocked, especially Abuela. Ever since that day, Mirabel has been desperately trying to make up for not having a gift by helping out in an attempt to “make her family proud”. Abuela and Isabela over the years distanced themselves from Mirabel because she did not have a magical gift and the pressures they carried respectively. Being the only child not blessed with a gift, she is constantly being made to feel left out of her family. Despite this, she genuinely loves her family.

My design:

The costume I would design for Mirabel would be to have her in a white long, frilly sleaved top, with pink and black embroidered onto the edge of the frills. This would give the top a bit of a pop of colour so its not just plane boring white. Mirabel would also have a long blue skirt with lots of pink, purple and orange embroidery on it. She would also have parts of her whole family’s gifts to give the feeling that they are all connected, not only but the Encanto and the miracle but my Mirabel herself.

Elements of design

Shape and pattern:

Shapes and patterns will be used a lot throughout Mirabel’s costume. This is because her costume will consist of lots of embroidery designs. Upon a closer look you can see that Mirabel has parts of her whole family embroidered onto her skirt and top. For example, Animals for Antonio’s gift and flowers for Isabella’s gift. Her costume also consists of the family candle and butterflies, which we find out later in the show/ movie that they represent the origins of the family’s miracle.

Colour:

Mirabel’s costume will consist of many very bright colours. The main colour of her costume will be shades of blue and white, with hints of pink, purple and orange. The colour blue represents freedom and loyalty, which I feel represent Mirabel very well because she is always trying to protect her family even if she wasn’t given a gift. She also is always very loyal to the family even when Abuela and Isabella, sort of exile her a bit when she wasn’t given a gift. The colours Pink and purple represent, peace and innocence. I feel like peace is a big one to talk about as part of Mirabel’s character development throughout her story is to find peace with herself after not getting a gift. Lastly the colour orange represents happiness and joy which basically sums up Mirabel’s entire personality.

Mood Board:

No Comments »

Keys For life safety campaign

Reflection Questions

What were the biggest things you learnt while completing this task?

Something that I learned was that drunk driving is one of the biggest risk factors when driving on roads are intoxicated drivers. The casualty crash risk also doubles when driving with an alcohol level just more than 0.05 BAC, and the risk of involvement in a fatal crash increases even more sharply.

What one piece of advice would you pass on to young drivers above all else? Why?

One piece of advice I would pass on to young drivers is that any alcohol in your system at all will affect your ability to drive. This means that you can cause fatal crashes and you could sustain long- term injuries or death to yourself, our passengers, or other drivers on the road.

Write down a pledge that you will commit to when you start driving. Why did you pick these things to commit to? How will you stick to these commitments?

I will commit to never drink and drive and go high over the speed limit. I chose to commit to these things as they will not only protect myself on the roads, but it will protect other drivers. I will stick to these commitments by always paying attention to my speed on the road and think before I get into my car to drive home after I have been drinking and maybe get an uber or taxi instead.

Final Product

No Comments »

Science – Engineering Challange

Our challenge is to design and create a structure using spaghetti and blue tac to withstand the force of a simulated earthquake for 10 seconds. As a group, our intended outcome is for the building to absorb the impact with minor to no damage at all.

It needs to be resistant to earthquakes while following the measures of being quick and easy to build, with a minimum of 60 cm high, 30cm x 30cm max base all within a budget of $60.

The building needs to be able to withstand a major earthquake. This is important because people need quick and easy ways to build a stable structure when a major earthquake occurs.

Our research

Our Original Design

Our design consists of a lot of cross bracing in the base, as in our research we discovered that cross bracing is a good way to keep a building together and stable after and during an earthquake. We also added some extra support halfway up the base of the building just for some extra support. The roof of our building is also quite stable, I believe that it may wobble a little bit due to the fact that it is not as supported as the rest of our building. Overall I predict that outbuilding will survive the tests and come out with little to no damage.  

Costs:

Spaghetti: 387 cm ($38.7)

Blue Tack: 10 grams ($10)

= $48.7

Our Model:

Resluts of our tests:

There was no damage caused to our building. 

We tested our building  on the three different types of earthquakes, convergent, transform and divergent. 

Advantages and disadvantages of our building:

Advantages:

Our building was very cheap for us to build as we were under budget. 

Our Building survived three catastrophic earthquakes making it very structurally strong. 

Our Building met the building requirements of a maximum of 30cm by 30cm base and a minimum height of 60cm. 

Disadvantages:

Our building was pretty small as the base was only 13cm by 11cm. 

Our building was not easy to assemble as it was a very tedious thing to build because of all the little pieces of pasta. 

Our building may have been very strong structurally but it was quite oddly shaped making it not very appealing to look at. 

Our improved design:

We added extra support on the side of our building because it supports the upper parts of our building as this area of our building has the least amount of support. These changes are drawn in yellow. 

We used an additional 100cm of spaghetti and 1g in blue tac. 

All up our improvements cost $11. 

This made to total costs of the original build and the improvements come to $59. 

Testing of our new design:

When we shake tested our building again, there was no damage made to the structure of the building. This time the roof did not shake as much as it did the first time as there was more support as the new pieces of spaghetti were supporting it leaving the roof and building with no damage done.

Communicating:

Our building we believe was very strong structurally. When we did our three tests using three different types of earthquakes (converging, diverging and transform), our building did not break and the structure did not even shake it. The whole thing stayed together and strong, the only thing that did move a little bit was the roof. This was because it was the thing that we tried to make more stable when we did our improvements.  

Some big changes that we could have made to our engineering process are making sure that everyone was on the same and making sure that no one was left behind on the stile questions. This would have made sure that we were all ready to start building at the same time. This would have made it easier to get our shake test done and we could have spoken about it in lost more depth, instead of people having to run off and finish off their unfinished questions. We all definitely all should have been on the same page about what design we were creating. We started out with one design but changed it that day we started building. When we drew up our first design everyone put that in their stile but when we drew up the other one not everyone knew to change it. This meant that half of the group had a different design.

Teamwork:

During this investigation, our group really tried our best to make sure that everyone was having a go at everything, but also making sure each person was taking charge of what tasks they were responsible for.  

Aiden:

Financial manager – responsible for financial matters for the team, keeping track of money spent using a spreadsheet. When we were all having issues working out how much our entire building costed Aiden was really helpful as he just took charge of working that out, instead of the other three of us all struggling with it. This turned out to be really helpful for the group as it was done really quickly and the group didn’t have to ponder over the cost of our building.

Ayden:

Equipment manager -makes sure that the materials needed for the task are available and that everyone cleans up after each session. Ayden was great at getting the materials for our group. He made sure that we had everything we needed for our build and for out improvements. He also threw some really good ideas in when we were drawing up our design that was very beneficial to the structure of our building not collapsing/ breaking when we did our tests.

Georgia:

Technology director – responsible for collecting/presenting internet research data, creating a PowerPoint Presentation. I feel as if I was pretty good at the actual building and designing part of this investigation. I feel like I had a few great ideas that got the building to the requirements and made sure that it did not crumble/break when we did our three tests.

Ruthie:

Project manager – makes sure that everyone understands the challenge and keeps the team on track. Ruthie was really good at getting the rest of our group’s attention when we all needed to do something, when someone needed help or when something was wrong that the rest of us didn’t notice. She was also great at suggesting ideas for our design, for our improvements and what pieces of spaghetti was uneccessasery for our design or our improved design.

No Comments »

Drama Musical- Cinderella

Question Two: Please discuss the vocal techniques you selected to create your character.

The vocal techniques I selected to create my character are tone and pace. I used tone to suggest that my character was very stuck up and not nice at all. There are moments in the play where Cinderella and Minerva have a raw moment, this is a moment where I had to transition my tone from this very stuck up and mean character to a small amount of kindness and sympathy. I also used pace, I had to use then in part of the show when Minerva started to ramble or when she was in an argument with her sister, Cinderella, or her stepmother. This is really shown in scene 7 after the ball.

Question Five: Discuss how you used the elements of drama (mood, relationships, dramatic tension, time, and space) to create dramatic meaning in your performance.

I used the element of drama relationship to create meaning in my performance. There are three main relationships that Minerva has, these are with her sister, mother, and Cinderella. Minerva and Calliope have a “love, hate” relationship. During the play, the only time they are nice to each other is when they are ordering Cinderella around or when they are being mean to her. Other than those moments Minerva and Calliope are always fighting and arguing with each other. Minerva’s relationship with her mother is only a one-way relationship. Minerva is always trying to impress her mother and show her love, but her mother is always pushing her aside to get what she wants. The last relationship that she has is with Cinderella, throughout the play she starts to actually like Cinderella, even if she is hiding it just to impress her sister and mother.

No Comments »

Year 9 Statistics project

What are we studying

For this project, the teachers conducted a survey for which we analysed and described student’s opinion and suggestions towards the uniform (categorical) and their preferred school times (numerical). We need this data so that the staff can apply suggestions and improve life at school for students. 

The Validity and reliability of research methods used in this project

For this project, we received data from everyone who is in Year nine math, this includes year 8 students who are accelerated.  The data given to us is convenience sampling as the test was made compulsory towards the participants (Year 9 Maths). As I stated the data includes accelerated Year 8 students, to make sure the data was reliable and valid they did not make any generalizations. This data may not be valid as it might include non-response bias. This may be because the participants got tired or bored as there were a lot of questions and,  may have randomly priced answers even if they did not agree with them. Finally, our responses were completely anonymous (maintaining our anonymity), and did not use impartial language, this made sure that people were not feeling inclined to give “socially acceptable answers”. 

Results

Our frequency table for our categorical data

Our Frequency table for our numerical data

The range of the start time is 4 hours

Female data

Mean – 8.7 hours

Median – 9 hours

Mode – 8 hours

The interquartile range is 1.5 hours

Male data

Mean – 8.5 hours

Median – 8 hours

Mode – 8 hours

The interquartile range  is 2 hours

Non-binary data

Mean –  9

Median – 9

Mode –  10

The interquartile range  is 1 hour

Our Categorical Data

This is one of the graphs we did for our categorical data. It shows years 9’s thoughts on uniforms and is a bar graph, this graphs tends towards a symmetrical graph. There is an outlier in here, which would be the non-binary people (2 people chose “We should just have a sport uniform” and 1 other chose “We should have a new, more modern  formal uniform”).

These are our other graphs for our categorical data. It is represented as a pie chart. In two of the graphs there are outliers, these being the number 42 in the girls and the number 50 in the boys. There are no outliers in the non-binary graph.

Numerical Data

This is one of our graphs for our numerical data. We chose to represent this in a bar graph. This graph again tends towards a symmetrical graph. There are no outliers in this graph because the data was very even.

This is another way that we chose to represent our numerical data, as a line graph. Like the other graph there are no outliers.

Our Box Plots

This is our box pot that we created for the male students. Like before in the other two numerical data graphs there are no outliers.

This is our other box plot that we created for the females. Like our other two graphs and the males box plot there are no outliers.

This is the box plot for the non-binary people. This also has no outliers. But it may look different to the others because there were only three people that chose non-binary in the survey.

Our findings

These were some of our findings over the 3 weeks we were conducting There are more male students on average than female students, which is shown in the male’s higher median. The female students’ graphs tend towards symmetrical as well as The males. For the non-binary people, it is hard to conclude whether it positively or negatively skewed as there is little data to go off making it an outlier. For two of the groups, they both had the same starting number of 7 and the other group started at the number 9.Something interesting about our data was that a lot of it was quite equal in numbers for both of our questions. That was very surprising for us.

Reflection on our work

Limitations:

Limitations of our work were mainly that there were year eights that did this survey, meaning that it was not just one group doing the survey so their  opinions would be different to year 9’s.  

Recommendations:

I recommend that next year there are: Have more options for the answers to the survey, Better wording of survey questions because some were hard to understand, Year 8’s did the survey could have affected the results, In the survey, we had a bias response as the survey was quite lengthy so make it shorter so people don’t lose interest by the end of it.

Experience with the task:

Our experience with this task was very good. It took us a little bit to get a grip of excel, but other than that everything was great. It was not only a serious task but it was also fun because we didn’t have to always sit doing lots of content and have to end up doing a test. All the data was set out very well so it was easy to read. It was also good to work with a partner and not always by yourself, we were able to split out some of the questions but also do some together. There were somethings that we found challenging, but I would do a project like this in the future.

No Comments »

John Button Vs Western Australia

In this project, we learnt about the principles of justice that uphold Australia’s legal system, such as the presumption of innocence, an impartial judiciary, and the right to legal representation. I studied the case of John button, and analysed how these principles were both upheld and violated in this case. After writing an essay on the topic, we were required to incorporate feedback and edit the essay so that it was fit for online publication. This essay is the end result of that editing process. It demonstrates my ability to take feedback, and to refine a piece of written work to produce a professional result.

Introduction

In 1965 John Button was blamed for the homicide of his then sweetheart. She was murdered in a Car accident. Mr. Button was seen as liable for this wrongdoing and was condemned to 20 years in jail however simply served five because of appropriate conduct. Altogether court procedures the standards of equity are included. For this situation 3 were undermined and 1 was maintained which caused him to be imprisoned for 5 years.

The right to a fair trial

The first undermined was the right to a fair trial. John button didn’t have a reasonable preliminary since evidence was held from the court. This being the first mishap report filed by the first examiners. On the off chance that this proof has appeared in court the possibly John Button couldn’t ever have been condemned for a wrongdoing that he didn’t carry out.

Right to a reasonable appeal

The second damaged was the right to a reasonable appeal. Mr. Button applied more than 10 appeals over the five years he was in prison. These were denied due to the fact that everybody felt that he was blameworthy. Assuming the court had permitted his case to be renewed, perhaps he wouldn’t have gone to prison for a wrongdoing he didn’t perpetrate and he wouldn’t have had an imprint on his name for over 40 years.

The Jury must be independent and impartial

The last principle threatened was that the jury should be independent and impartial. At John Buttons court hearing, he was undermined with a known chronic Killer at the time Edgar Cooke. The Jury from that second previously thought he was naturally liable because he was considered like Edgar Cooke. On the off chance that the jury had not been prejudice towards Mr button, there may have been an alternate ending to his case.

All are equal before the law

The solitary standard not traded off yet maintained for this situation was all are equivalent under the steady gaze of the law. John Button was not decided on his appearance, sex or race. In any case, the jury or judge couldn’t have cared less about that lone that they thought he was naturally liable. Unfortunately, even though Mr. Button was equivalent under the steady gaze of the law, the appointed authority, the police jury broke different standards of equity.

Conclusion

In 2002 John’s name was at last cleared because he was endorsed an allure and found not guilty. this was simply because a book was distributed clarifying Mr. Buttons case and that book incorporated that unique mishap report. Even though john Button was not in jail at the time he would not like to leave behind an opportunity to demonstrate his innocence. Along these lines, in February of 2002, he was seen not as blameworthy of the homicide of his sweetheart. They discovered one year later that we had been Edgar Cooke who had executed her. They might have found this back in 1965 if the court had followed and maintained the standards of equity. This case is an incredible illustration of how vital these standards are.

No Comments »